Daily Times - Saturday, April 6, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
WILDE MUST GO TO JAIL
He is This Morning Charged With a Heinous Crime and is Refused Bail.
Evidence Already
Given. If True, Proves His Guilt — Taylor Arraigned.
London, April 6.— Wilde’s friend, Taylor, was arrested to-day. Wilde was arraigned this morning charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime, and also having commit the crime himself. Alfred Taylor was placed in the prisoners’ dock, charged with being an accessory to Wilde’s crimes. Wilde greeted Taylor smilingly.
A young man named Parker was the first witness examined. He testified regarding his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, the meetings between Wilde and witness, conversation and conduct at the meetings. He swore he received money and presents from Wilde. Parker’s story, if true, proves the case against Wilde. Counsel for defendant reserved his right to cross-examine Parker.
A young man named Parker was the last witness examined. He testified to his introduction to Wilde by Taylor and the meetings between witness and Wilde, their conversations and conduct at the meetings. He also swore he received money presents from Wilde. Parker’s story, if true, proves a case against Wilde. Counsel for the defendants reserved the right to cross-examine Parker.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded, bail being refused.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case, says: "The case proves that it is unsafe to say that art has nothing to do with immorality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case says: The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case, says: It proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde's art rests on the basis of rottenness and corruption.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the result of Wilde’s prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry, says: "The case proves that it is untrue to say that art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the result of Wilde’s prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry, says:— "This cave proves that it is untrue to say that art has noting to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the result of Wilde's prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry. says: -"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde's art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the result of Wilde's prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry, says: "The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption.