Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis of Queensbery, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholts Douglas, states that the latter,
both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas
and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensbery than the challenge to fight to the finish for £1,000 aside, was reluctantly
compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord
Queensbery in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying
he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in his court. Lord
Queensbery continued his annoyances, and a second application was made to Mr Hannay,
who, after consultation, still refused a summons. At last the
annoyance become intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute necessity
of adopting the course he did, of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensbery. The writer proceeds to criticise adversely the action of Mr Hannay in
refusing a summons, and adds, referring to the cheering in the street,
for such feats Lord Queensbery seems to be rapidly taking the place of the great Duke
of Wellington in the hearts of the British public.
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the latter,
both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas
and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensberry than a challenge to fight to a finish for £1,000 a side, was reluctantly
compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord
Queensberry in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying
he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in his court. Lord
Queensberry continued his annoyances, and a second application was made to Mr Hannay,
who, after consultation with Mr Newton, still refused a summons. At
last the annoyance become intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute
necessity of adopting the course he did of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensberry. The writer proceeds to criticize adversely the action of Mr Hannay in
refusing the summons, and asks, referring to the cheering in the
street, for which of his feats Lord Queensberry seems to be rapidly taking the place
of the great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of the British
public.
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the latter,
both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas
and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensberry than a challenge to light to a finish for £1,000 a side, was reluctantly
compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord
Queensberry in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying
he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in this court. Lord
Queensberry continued his annoyances, and the second application was made to Mr Hannay,
who, after consultation with Mr Newton, still refused a summons.
At last the annoyance became intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute
necessity of adopting the course he did of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensberry. The writer proceeds to critice adversely the action of Mr Hannay in refusing
the summons, and asks, referring to the cheering in the streets,
for which of his feats Lord Queensberry seems to be rapidly taking the place of the
great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of the British public?
London, Saturday.
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis
of Queensberry, and Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states
that the latter, both personally and through his solicitor, having
frequently begged the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language
to Lord Douglas and his wife, and having received no more
satisfactory answer from Lord Queensberry than a challenge to fight to a finish for
£1,000 a side, was reluctantly compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a
summons against Lord Queensberry in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused
the application, saying he declined to have any more dirty linen
washed in his court. Lord Queensberry continued his annoyances, and a second application
was made to Mr Hannay, who, after consultation with Mr Newton,
ill refused a summons. At last the annoyance become intolerable, and Lord Douglas
was reduced to the absolute necessity of adopting the course he did of
publicly assaulting Lord Queensberry. The writer proceeds to criticize adversely the
action of Mr Hannay in refusing the summons, and asks, referring to
the cheering in the street, for which of his feats Lord Queensberry seems to be rapidly
taking the place of the great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of
the British public.
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing in reference to the fracas which concurred between his
father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and Lord Douglas
of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the letter, both personally
and through his solicitor having frequently begged the Marquis to
cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas and his wife,
and having received no more satisfactory answer from Lord
Queensberry than a challenge to fight to a finish for £1000 a side, was reluctantly
compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord Queensberry
in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying he declared
to have any more dirty linen washed in his court. Lord Queensberry
continued his annoyances, and a second application was made to Mr Hannay, who, after
consultation with Mr Newton, still refused a summons. At last the
annoyance became intolerable and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolutely necessity
of adopting the course he did of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensberry. The writer proceeds to criticise adversely the action of Mr Hannay in
refusing the summons, and asks, referring to the cheering in the
streets, for which of his feats Lord Queensberry seems to be rapidly taking the place
of the great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of the British
public.
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the latter,
both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas
and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensberry than a challenge to fight to a [...] for £1,000 a [...], was reluctantly
compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for [...] against Lord
Queensberry in order to have him [...]. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying
he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in his court. Lord
Queensberry continued his annoyances, and the [...] to Mr Hannay, who, [...] Mr Newton,
still refused a summons [...] the annoyances became intolerable,
and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute [...] of adopting the [...] consulting
Lord Queensberry [...] to criticise adversely [...] the cheering in
the [...] Lord Queensberry [...] taking the place of the great [...] in the [...]
of the British [...].
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred
between his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the latter,
both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas
and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensberry than a challenge to fight to a finish for a thousand pounds aside,
was reluctantly compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against
Lord Queensberry in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application,
saying he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in his court.
Lord Queensberry continued his annoyances, and a second application was made to Mr
Hannay, who, after consultation with Mr Newton, still refused a
summons. At last the annoyance became intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to
the absolute necessity of adopting the course he did, of publicly
assaulting Lord Queensberry.