Previous report
The Bay of Plenty Times - Monday, May 27, 1895
The Bay of Plenty Times - Monday, May 27, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
Oscar Wilde sentenced.
London, May 26.—The trial of Oscar Wilde has concluded, the summing up of the Judge occupied three hours and the jury were absent 2 hours considering their verdict.
The trial of Oscar Wilde concluded to-day. The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours and the jury were absent two hours considering their verdict.
The trial of Oscar Wilde was concluded to-day. The summing up of the judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict. They returned a verdit of guilty on all counts.
The trial of Oscar Wilde was concluded to-day. The summing up of the judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict. They returned a verdit of guilty on all counts.
The trial of Oscar Wilde was concluded to-day. The summing up of the judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict. They returned a verdit of guilty on all counts.
The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict.
The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict.
The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict.
The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict.
The summing up of the Judge occupied three hours, and the jury were absent two hours in considering their verdict.
They returned with a verdict of guilty on all counts.
His Honor in sentencing the prisoners Wilde and Taylor spoke with great emotion; the verdict to his mind was a correct one beyond all shadow of doubt and it appeared to him useless to address the prisoners who were evidently dead to all sense of shame.
The case was the worst of its kind he had ever had before him and in passing the most severe sentence the law permitted he regretted that it was totally inadequate to the dastardly nature of the offence, he then sentenced each prisoner to two years' hard labour.
Taylor left the dock with a firm step but Wilde appeared quite dazed and horror struck, in his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court but this was unheeded and the warders hurried him off to the cell.
Taylor left the dock with a firm step, but Wilde appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. IN his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to the cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to the cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to the cell.
Oscar Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
Wilde, after being sentenced, appeared quite dazed and horror-struck. In his despair he weakly murmured a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and tba warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
In his despair he weakly uttered a request to be permitted to address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man and referring to his associations with him said the reason for his friendship was because he personally liked praise and lionising was delightful.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man; and referring to his associations with him, said the reason of the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful.
He said he had always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and referring to his association with him said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for his friendship was because he personally like praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering rom weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man; and referring to his associations with him, said the reason of the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness box. While giving evidence on his own behalf, he said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man; and, referring to his associations with him, said the reason of the friendship was because he personally like praise, and lionising was delightful.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness-box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise and lionising was delightful to him.
He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man; and referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally like praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness-box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said that he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and referring to his association with him, said that the reason of his friendship was because he personally liked praise and lionising was delightful.
During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness-box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said that he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and referring to his association with him, said that the reason of his friendship was because he personally liked praise and lionising was delightful.
London, May 27.—During the trial, Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness, was allowed to remain seated in the witness-box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and, referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him.
London, May 24. --While giving evidence to-day, Oscar Wilde, who. appeared very weak, was allowed to be seated in the witness box. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man. Referring to the station in life of the people with whom he had associated, he said the reason for his friendship with them, was that he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful.
London, May 24. -- While giving evidence to-day, Oscar Wilde, who appeared very weak, was allowed to be seated in the witness box. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man. Referring to the station in life of the people with whom he had associated, he said the reason for his friendship with them was that he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Counsel for the accused declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers and it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q. C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edwd. Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edwd. Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clark, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edwd. Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses, and that it was impossible to believe them.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Oscar Wilde's counsel, in his address to the jury, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were all blackmailers, whose statements it was impossible to believe.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas?
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas?
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury asked whether it was intanded to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas?
The Judge replied that he was not aware of the intention of the police.
The judge replied that he was not aware of the intention of the police, but it did not affect the present trial.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letters showed him guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him guilty the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him guilty the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him guilty the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury though that if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury thought if Wilde's letter showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury said that if the letters addressed by Wilde to Lord Alfred Douglas showed Wilde to be guilty the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
The jury contended that if the letters addressed by Wilde to Lord Alfred Douglas showed Wilde to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred Douglas.
His Honor concurred in his opinion but added that the jury's suspicions that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was unfounded.
His Honor concurred in his opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections, was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in his opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections, was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in his opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections, was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the jury's suspicion that the son of the Marquis of Queeneberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honour concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensbery was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensbery was being allowed to escape, owing to his connections, was both unfounded and unwarranted.
His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensbury was being allowed to escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.
Metadata
- Newspaper:
- The Bay of Plenty Times
- Date published:
- 1895-05-27
- Region:
- New Zealand
- Original language:
- English
- Sources:
- Papers Past
- paperspast.natlib.govt.nz
- Facsimile:
- paperspast.natlib.govt.nz
- Word count:
- 323
- Report data updated:
- 2022-04-22
Document matches
- Auckland Star - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 84.6%
Compare - Manawatu Herald - Tuesday, May 28, 1895 - 84.2%
Compare - The Star - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 84.1%
Compare - The Evening Star - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 82.7%
Compare - Evening Post - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 82.1%
Compare - New Zealand Times - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 81.3%
Compare - New Zealand Herald - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 73.3%
Compare - Te Aroha News - Wednesday, May 29, 1895 - 72.0%
Compare - The Press - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 71.5%
Compare - The Ashburton Guardian - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 71.5%
Compare - The Lyttelton Times - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 71.2%
Compare - The Oamaru Mail - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 70.3%
Compare - The Otago Daily Times - Monday, May 27, 1895 - 69.2%
Compare