New-York Tribune - Sunday, April 7, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
BAIL FOR WILDE REFUSED.
WITH HIS FRIEND TAYLOR HE IS REMANDED
TO JAIL - THE EXAMINATION IN THE BOW
STREET POLICE COURT.
London, April 6. - Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning. His friend, Alfred Taylor, was arrested and taken to the Bow-st. police station. When Wilde was arraigned in the Bow-st. Police Court this morning Taylor was also placed in the prisoner’s dock. As Taylor stepped into the dock, Wilde smilingly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with sharp features and a fair complexion. Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but the bail was refused.
Charles Parker, nineteen years old, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and said that the latter told him Wilde was "good for money." Parker told the story which, if true, proves the case of the Treasury against Wilde. Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross-examine Parker.
William Parker, a brother of the first witness called, was placed on the stand and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde, in March, 1893.
William Parker, a brother of the first witness called, was placed on the stand and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde in March, 1893.
Wm. Parler, a brother of the first witness called, was placed on the stand and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde in March, 1893.
William Parker, a brother of the first witness called, was placed on the stand and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde in March, 1893. Charles Parker was bound over in the sum of £85 to give evidence in the Old Bailey proceedings.
William Parker, a brother of the first witness, called, was placed on the stand and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde in March, 1893, Charles Parker was bound over in the sum of £85 to give evidence in the Old Bailey proceedings.
Charles Parker was bound over in the sum of £85 to give evidence in the Old Bailey proceedings.
Charles Parker was bound over in the sum of £85 to give evidence in the Old Bailey proceedings.
Charles Parker was bound over in £85 to give evidence in the Old Bailey proceedings.
The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged was next examined, and gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she had heard Taylor address somebody as "Oscar," but did not recognize Wilde as having been one of her lodger’s visitors.
The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged was next examined, and gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she had heard Taylor address somebody as Oscar, but did not recognize Wilde as having been one of her lodger’s visitors.
The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged, was next examined, and gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she had heard Taylor address somebody as Oscar, but did not recognize Wilde as having been one of her lodger’s visitors.
The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged was next examined and gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she had heard Taylor address somebody as Oscar, but did not recognize Wilde as being one of her lodger’s visitors.
The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she heard Taylor addressed somebody as Oscar, but did not recognize Wilde as having been one of her lodgers’ visitors.
William Parker, a brother of the first witness called, was placed on the stand, and confirmed the story of the first meeting between his brother and Wilde In March, 1893. The landlady of the house in which Taylor lodged was next examined, and gave testimony regarding the youths who attended the tea parties given by Taylor. She said she had heard Taylor address somebody as Oscar, but did not recognize Wilde as having been one of her lodger's visitors.
Alfred Wood, the man whose passage to America was paid by Wilde, testified that he met Wilde at the Café Royal in January, 1893. He went to Wilde's house, No. 16 Tite-st., Chelsea, S.W. He said he was drunk at the time of this visit. Wilde, he said, had often given money to him, and had visited him at his lodgings, but he strenuously denied any wrongdoing. In regard to this point the witness was strongly pressed by the magistrate, but reiterated his denials of misconduct. Wilde had given £35 to him altogether, on the receipt of which sum he had handed over to Wilde a number of letters written by him. Subsequently he went to America, remaining abroad fourteen months. He desired to go to America he said, to get away from Wilde and certain other persons, who are now absent from England.
The next witness was a youth named Mavor, who absolutely denied that there had been anything wrong in his relations with Wilde.
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made today in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Hawick, eldest living son of the Marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says:"My mother, my sister and myself believe the allegations made against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made today in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Haywick, eldest living son of the Marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says: "My mother, my sister, and myself believe the allegations made against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made to-day in the course of an interview, by Lord Douglas, of Hawaick, eldest living son of the marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement, the writer of the letter says:
"My mother, my sister, and myself believe the allegations made against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made today in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Hawich, eldest living son of the marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says: "My mother, my sister and myself believe the allegations made against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglass, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made to-day in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas, of Hawick, eldest living son or the Marquis, to the effect that no member of the family, except his father, believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says:— "My mother, my sister and myself believe the allegations against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating a statement made yesterday in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Hawick, eldest living son of the Marquis, to the effect that no member of his family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says:— "My mother, my sister and myself believe all the allegations against Oscar Wilde."
London, April 6.- Rev. A. E. Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made in an interview by Lord Douglas, of Hawick, eldest living son of the Marquis, that no member of the family, except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation, the writer of the letter says: "My mother, my sister and myself believe the allegations against Oscar Wilde."
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made to-day in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Hawick, eldest living son of the Marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of this statement the writer of the letter says:
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Queensberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement, made today in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas of Hawich, eldest living son of the marquis, to the effect that no member of the family except his father believes the charges against Wilde. In refutation of the statement the writer of the letter says:
Archibald Edward Douglas, brother of the Marquis of Ouceusberry, has written a letter repudiating the statement made to-day in the course of an interview by Lord Douglas, of Hawke, eldest living son of tbe Marquis, to the effect that no member of the family, except his father, believes the charges against Wilde.
The charge against Wilde is being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment act, which classes his offence is a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years’ imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is being prosecuted under the criminal Law Amendment act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years’ imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which classes his offense as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum of penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which classifies his offense as a misdemeanor, the minimum sentence for which is two years' imprisonment for each conviction.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the criminal law amendment act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each continuation.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the criminal law amendment act, which classes his offence as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment for each continuation.
The charge against Wilde is meantime being prosecuted under the Criminal Law Amendment act, which classes his offense as a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty for which is two years' imprisonment for conviction.
The charge against Wilde in the meantime is being prosecuted under the criminal law amendment act, under which his offense is a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty being two years for each conviction.
"AN IDEAL HUSBAND" SHELVED HERE
Daniel Frohman has decided to withdraw "An Ideal Husband" after this week and will produce at the Lyceum Theatre on next Tuesday, April 16, a new play adapted from the French by Frederick Horner entitled "Fortune." This play will employ the following ladies and gentlemen of the Lyceum Theatre Company: Miss Isabel Irving, Miss Rhoda Cameron, Mrs. Thomas Whiffen, Herbert Kelcey, W.J. Le Moyne, Charles Walcot, Fritz Williams, Stephen Grattan, W.S. Hale, Ferdinand Gottschaik and Ernest Tarleton.