Oakland Tribune - Thursday, April 4, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
ROASTED.
Oscar Wilde in
a Corner.
He Breaks Down in
His Testimony.
Terrific Scorching
Given Him
by Counsel.
Aesthetes Holding Up Their Hands in
Holy Horror.
LONDON, April 4. -- There was unabated interest today at Old Bailey in the taking of testimony in the suit for libel brought by Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry.
LONDON, April 4. -- There was unabated interest today at the old Bailey in the taking of testimony in the suit for libel brought by Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry. The audience was largely composed of lawyers and reporters, there were few notable persons present.
LONDON, April 4. -- There was unabated interest to-day at the Old Bailey in the taking of the testimony in the suit for libel brought by Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry. The audience was largely composed of lawyers and reporters. There were a few notable persons present.
London, April 4. -- There was unabated interest today at the old Bailey in the taking testimony in the suit for libel brought by Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry. The audience was largely composed of lawyers and reporters. There were few notable persons present.
The audience was largely composed of lawyers and reporters.
There were a few notable persons present.
The plaintiff arrived at an early hour and took a seat at the table reserved for solicitors.
Plaintiff arrived at an early hour and took a seat at the table reserved for the solicitors.
The Marquis of Queensberry entered in a few minutes looking jaunty and confident.
The Marquis of Queensberry entered a few minutes later, looking jaunty and confident.
The Marquis of Queensberry at 10:25 entered the court room looking calm and confident.
Several of his friends shook the defendant's hands as he entered the dock.
Several of his friends shook the defendant by the hand as he entered the clock.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor which were artistically furnished and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished, and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness-stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor which were artistically furnished and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness-stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished, and in which perfumes were burning.
The cross-examination was resumed on the second day, when Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness-stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished, and in which perfumes were burning.
Oscar Wilde, upon resuming his place on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended tea parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished, and in which perfumes were burning. He denied, however, that he had seen Taylor in a woman's costume.
He denied, however, that he had seen Taylor in a woman's costume.
Further questions upon the part of Mr. Carson, counsel for the Marquis of Queensberry, brought forth the admission that Taylor introduced to Wilde five youths to whom Wilde gave money and took to a restaurant.
He denied, however, that he had seen Taylor in woman's costume. Further questions upon the part of Mr. Carson, counsel for the Marquis of Queensberry, brought forth the admission that Taylor introduced to Wilde five youths to whom Wilde gave money and took them to dinner at a restaurant.
Plaintiff admitted that he was not aware one of them was a valet and another a coachman or that Taylor had been arrested in a raid in a house on Fitzroy Square.
The plaintiff admitted that he was not aware that one of them was a valet and another a coachman, or that Taylor had been arrested in a raid on a house on Fitzroy square.
The plaintiff added that he was not aware that one of them was a valet and another a coachman or that Taylor had been arrested in a raid on a house in Fitzroy Square.
WILDE GETS RATTLED.
Wilde, in answers to questions, exhibited confusion and contradicted himself frequently.
Wilde, in the answers to the questions put to him, exhibited confusion and contradicted himself frequently. He also lost his temper.
Wilde, in his answers to the questions put to him, exhibited confusion and contradicted himself frequently. He also lost his temper.
He also lost his temper.
Carson's questions were in the main pitiless and unprintable.
Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at noon, having lasted over six hours.
Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at noon, having lasted over six hours.
Mr. Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at noon, having lasted, including the time of yesterday, over six hours.
Mr. Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at noon, after having lasted, including the time of yesterday, over six hours.
Mr. Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at noon after having lasted, including the time of yesterday, over six hours.
Sir Edward Clark, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry, in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease the "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces."
Sir Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the marquis of Queensberry in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces."
Sir Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensbery, in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglass, to cease his "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces."
Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began his examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff. He added:
Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry, in which he called his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his acquaintance with the plaintiff, saying:
Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the redirect examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry, in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglass, to cease his "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces." He added, "If you do not cease to let him disgrace us, I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
Sir Edward Clark, the leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease the "infamous intimacy" with plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of the infamous faces." He added: "I hear Wilde's wife will petition for a divorce on the grounds of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us, I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
Sir Edward Clark, the leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease the "infamous intimacy" with plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces." He added: "I hear Wilde's wife will petition for a divorce on the grounds of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us, I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the re-direct examination of his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry, in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his "infamous intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sight of their infamous faces." He added: "I hear that Wilde’s wife will petition for a divorce on the ground of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
He added: "I hear Wilde's wife will petition for a divorce on the ground of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
He added "I her that Wilde's wife will petition for a divorce on the grounds of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace you I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
He added: "I hear that Wilde's wife will petition for divorce on the grounds of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace you I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
I hear that Wilde's wife will petition for a divorce on the ground of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight.
"A FUNNY LITTLE MAN."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied, "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter, Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred relied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying:
"What a funny little man you are."
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that the St. James' Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repeat it."
Most of the papers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that the St. James Gazette says: The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repeat it.
Most of the papers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such to-day that the "St. James Gazette" says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repeat it.
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we can not reproduce it."
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such to-day that the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we connot report it."
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the chief testimony is such to-day that the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we can not reproduce it."
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but its character is such to-day that the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence, and the whole circumstances of the case have come to be of such a character that we cannot report it.
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot report it." The Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such to-day, that the st. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repeat. The English public at the present moment is involved in origies of indecency permitted by the operation of the open law courts and the enterprising prosecution."
The St. James' Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those orgies of indecency, permitted by the operations of open law courts and an enterprising press."
The St. James Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those orgies of indecency permitted by the courts and an enterprising press."
The St. James Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those orgies of indecency permitted by the operation of open law courts and an enterprising press." The Gazette urges that all such cases should be heard in camera.
"The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those orgies of indecency permitted by the courts and an enterprising press."
"The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repor it." The Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those orgies of indecency permitted by the operations of open law courts and an enterprising press."
After the noon recess the crowd in the courtroom was larger than ever and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well-dressed men waiting to enter.
After the noon recess the crowd in the courtroom was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well-dressed men.
After the noon recess, the crowd in the courtroom was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well-dressed men, who were awaiting a chance to enter.
After the noon recess the crowd in the court-room was larger than ever and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well-dressed men who were awaiting a chance to enter.
After the noon recess the crowd in the court room was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well dressed men who were waiting a chance to enter.
After the afternoon recess the crowd in the court-room was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten feet deep with well-dressed men in waiting.
At the afternoon session the crowd in the courtroom was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled ten deep with well-dressed men waiting.
After the noon recess the crowd in the court was larger than ever, and the hall and the stages leading to it were filled ten deep with well dressed men who were waiting a chance to enter.
After the noon recess the crowd in the court was larger than ever and the hall and the stages leading to it were filled ten deep with well dressed men who were waiting a chance to enter.
After the noon recess on April 4 the crowd in the courtroom was larger than ever, and the hall and stairs leading to it were filled 10 deep with well-dressed men.
Wilde kept the court waiting ten minutes, for which he apologized to Justice Collins, saying he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the Court waiting ten minutes for which he apologized to Justice Collins, saying he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the court waiting 10 minutes, for which he apologised to Justice Collins, saying he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the court waiting for ten minutes, for which he apologized to Justice Collins, saying that he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the court waiting for ten minutes, for which he apologized to Justice Collins, saying that he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the Court waiting for ten minutes, for which he apologized to Justice Collins, saying that he had been consulting his doctor.
Wilde kept the court waiting for ten minutes for which he apologized to Justice Collin, saying that he had been consulting his doctor.
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff was closed and Carson began his speech for the defense.
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff was closed and Carson began his speech for the defense. It was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the court room.
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff was closed. Carson began his speech for the defense. It was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the court-room.
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff was closed. Carson began his speech for the defense. It was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the court-room.
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff closed, and Carson began his speech for the defense. It was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the court room.
It was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the courtroom as soon as the counsel for the defendant began to speak.
Mr. Carson was terribly denunciatory of Wilde, who left the courtroom as soon as counsel for the defendant began to speak.
who left the court room as soon as counsel for the defendant began to speak.
Lord Alfred Douglass was present in the court a short time during the morning but did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in the court a short time during the morning but did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in the court a short time during the morning, but did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in the court for a short time during the morning, but did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in court a short time during the morning, but did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in court for a short time during the morning, but he did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in court for a short time during the morning, but he did not return in the afternoon.
Lord Alfred Douglas was present in court for a short time during the morning, but he did not return in the afternoon.
The speech of Carson for the defense lasted until the court adjourned at 5 p. m. and was not finished.
The speech of Mr. Carson for the defense lasted until the court adjourned at 5 o'clock p. m., and was not finished at that time.
He reviewed the evidence point by point, denounced Wilde and said the witnesses he would produce would prove beyond any doubt the guilt of the plaintiff.
Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of an anonymous letter handed to the English actor, whereupon, Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Beerbohm Tree."
During the course of his remarks Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of the anonymous letter handed the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Beerbohm Tree."
During the course of his remarks Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Mr. Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of the anonymous letter handed to the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Mr. Beerbohm Tree."
During the course of his remarks. Mr Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Mr Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of the anonymous letter handed to the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Mr. Beerbohm Tree."
During the course of his remarks Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Mr. Beerhohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of the anonymous letter handed to the English actor, wereupon Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Mr. Beerbohm Tree."
During the course of his remarks in opening the defense, Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms in the course of Mr. Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of the anonymous letter handed to the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said: "There is no occasion to mention the name of Mr. Beerbohn Tree."
Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Beerbohm Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of an anonymous letter handed the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said:
Mr. Carson alluded in complimentary terms to the course of Beerbohn Tree in forwarding to the plaintiff a copy of an anonymous letter handed the English actor, whereupon Justice Collins said:
Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Carson, in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Carson in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Carson, in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson, in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson, in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson, in reply, remarked, "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree to-day, asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor should I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree to-day asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson in reply remarked: "Nor would I do so, my lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
"Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from him today asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
Mr. Carson, in reply, remarked: "Nor should I do so, my Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Beerbohm Tree to-day asking that his connection be fully explained."
"Nor should I do so, My Lord, had it not been that I received a cable message from Mr. Tree, to-day, asking that his connection with the case be fully explained."
"Every one understands Mr. Tree's connection with the case was in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands Mr. Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands Mr. Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands Mr. Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands Mr Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honourable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree’s connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy." said the justice, in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honourable and praiseworthy," said the justice, in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every way honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Everyone understands that Mr. Tree's connection with the case is in every day honorable and praiseworthy," said the justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands that Mr. Tree connection with the case is in every way honorable und praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion.
"Every one understands Mr Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honourable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion. Wilde returned to the courtroom a few minutes before adjournment.
"Everyone understands Mr Tree's connection with the case. It is in every way honourable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion. Wilde returned to the Courtroom a few minutes before the adjournment.
"Everyone understands Mr. Tree's connection to the case. It is in every way honourable and praiseworthy," said the Justice in conclusion. Wilde returned to the Courtroom a few minutes before the adjournment.
Wilde returned to the courtroom a few minutes before adjournment.
Wilde returned to the courtroom a few minutes before adjournment.
Wilde returned to the court-room a few minutes before adjournment.
Wilde returned to the courtroom a few minutes before adjournment.
Wilde returned to the courtroom for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Wilde returned to the court-room for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Wilde returned to the court room for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Wilde returned to the court room for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Wilde returned to the court room for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Mr. Wilde returned to the courtroom for a few minutes before the adjournment.
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was "a cur and a coward of the Roseberry type."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde "was a cur and a coward of the Rosebery type."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde "was a cur and a coward of the worst type."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde "was a cur and a coward of the worst type."
Among the letters produced in court and addressed by the marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was a "cur and a coward of the Roseberry type."
Among the letters produced in court and addressed by the marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglass, was one saying that Wilde was a "cur and a coward of the Roseberry type."
Among the letters produced in court and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was "a cur and a coward of the Rosebery type."
Among the letters produced in court and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglass, was one saying that Wilde was "a cur and a coward of the Rosebery type."
Among the letters produced in court, and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was "a cur and a coward of the Rosbery type."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde "was a cur and a coward."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde "was a cur and a coward."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde was "a cur and a coward."
Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde "was a cur and a coward."
Among the letter produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying Wilde "was a cur and a coward."
Wilde returned to the court room a few minutes before adjournment. Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was a "cur and a coward of the Rosebery type."
Wilde returned to the court room a few minutes before adjournment. Among the letters produced and addressed by the Marquis of Queensbury to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was a "cur and a coward of the Rosebery type."
Wilde returned to the court room for a few minutes before the adjournment. Among the letters produced in court and addressed by the Marquis of Queensberry to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, was one saying that Wilde was a cur and coward of the Rosebery type.
Document matches
- Deseret Evening News - Thursday, April 4, 1895 - 95.8%
Compare - The Salt Lake Herald - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 94.0%
Compare - Los Angeles Herald - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 92.8%
Compare - St. Paul Daily Globe - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 86.4%
Compare - The Fort Worth Daily Gazette - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 81.1%
Compare - The Galveston Daily News - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 80.5%
Compare - The North American - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 79.4%
Compare - The Philadelphia Inquirer - Friday, April 5, 1895 - 74.6%
Compare - The World - Thursday, April 4, 1895 - 63.8%
Compare