The Philadelphia Times - Thursday, May 23, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
QUEENSBERRY AND
DOUGLAS IN COURT
FATHER AND SON BOTH HELD IN BAIL
TO KEEP THE PEACE.
OSCAR
WILDE AGAIN ON TRIAL
Lord Douglas Made Serious Objection to
His Father Sending Messages to His Wife.
A Serious Encounter in the Street
Ends in
a Scene in Court - Much Damaging Testi-
mony in the Wilde Case - Wilde Too Ill to
Remain in Court All Day - Foreign News
in General.
LONDON, May 22. At the Marlborough Street Police Court this morning the Marquis of Queensberry and son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, were bound over each in £500 bail, to keep the peace. Their appearance in the police court to-day was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
London, May 22 — At the Marlborough street police court this morning, the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, were bound over, each in £500 bail to keep the peace. Their appearance in the police court today, was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
London, May 22. -- At the Marlborough street police court this morning the marquis of Queensberry and his son Lord Douglas of Hawick, were bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace. Their appearance in the police court to-day was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
LONDON, May 22. — At the Marlborough Street Police Court this morning the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Douglass of Hawick, were bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace. Their appearance in the Police Court to-day was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
London, May 22 — At Marlborough Street police court this morning the Marquis of Queensbury and his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, were bound over, each in £500 bail to keep the peace. Their appearance in the police court today was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
At Marlborough street police court this morning, the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, were bound over, each in £500 bail, to keep the peace. The appearance in the police court to-day was the result of their encounter yesterday afternoon in Piccadilly.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Hawlck were fashionably dressed. The marquis wore a rose in his button hole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas of Hawick had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Hawick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any signs of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
LONDON, May 22. - Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick[sic] were fashionably dressed when they appeared in the police court today. The marvuis[sic] wore a rose in his button hole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglass of Hawick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglass of Hawick had a lawyer present to attend to his interests. The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and the son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and the son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but a very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct, as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct, as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other. In his defense the marquis of Queensberry said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis of Queensberry said that while walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis of Queensberry said that while walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, came running at him and pushed him against a store- window, speaking at the top of his voice.
The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense, the Marquis of Queensberry said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the marquis said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
HELD IN BAIL TO KEEP THE PEACE.
Counsel for Lord Douglas of Harwick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglas and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Harwick received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglas of Harwick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglas and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Harwick received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglass of Hawick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglass and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglass of Hawick yesterday received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglas said the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly not thinking of the Marquis when the encounter took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Hawick yesterday received the following telegram:
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy’s appearance. He looks like a dug up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde’s turn tomorrow.
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dried up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty; Wilde's turn to-morrow.
QUEENSBERRY.
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn to-morrow.
"QUEENSBERRY."
A telegram was received by Lady Douglas of Hawick from Queensberry was as follows. It was sent after the street fight:—"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty. It will be Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"Must congratulate on verdict. Cannot on Percy's appearance; looked like a dug-up corpse. Fear too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn tomorrow. -Queensberry.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing he had not done so. Yesterday, it was claimed that Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed that Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing these obscene and filthy letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglass false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed that Lord Douglass asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and 'filthy' letters to his wife." The Marquis then hit him in the face, and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The Marquis then bit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing these obscene and filthy letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
After further evidence, showing that the Marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over, each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
Further evidence showing that the marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the marquis and his son, being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After the further evidence showing that the marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 to keep the peace.
The Marquis, who wore a fresh boutonniere and presented a very jaunty appearance, admitted that he had offered to fight his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, anywhere or at anytime for £1,000. Lord Douglas showed a very black eye as the result of his encounter with his father, but the latter did not show a mark.
The Marquis, who wore a fresh boutonniere and presented a very jaunty appearance, admitted that he had offered to fight his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, anywhere or at any time for £10,000. Lord Douglas showed a very black eye as the result of his encounter with his father, but the latter did not show a mark.
The Marquis, who wore a fresh boutonniere, and presented a very jaunty appearance, admitted that he had offered to fight his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, anywhere or at any time, for £10,000. Lord Douglas showed a very black eye as the result of his encounter with his father, but the latter did not show a mark.
The Marquis, who wore a fresh boutonniere and presented a very jaunty appearance admitted that he had offered to fight his son, Lard Douglas of Hawick, any where or at any time for £10,000. Lord Douglas showed a very black eye as the result of his encounter with his father, but the latter did not show a mark. The crowd cheered the Marquis as he drove away, in a cab, and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas.
LONDON, May 22. - The marquis, who wore a fresh boutonniere and presented a very jaunty appearance, admitted that he had offered to fight his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, anywhere or at anytime for £10,000. Lord Douglas showed a very black eye as the result of his encounter with his father, but the latter did not show a mark. The crowd cheered the marquis as he drove away in a cab and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas as he took his departure.
The crowd cheered the Marquis as he drove away in a cab, and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas as he took his departure.
The crowd cheered the Marquis as he drove away in a cab, and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas as he took his departure.
The crowd cheered the marquis, as he drove away in a cab, and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas as he took his departure.
The crowd cheered the marquis, as he drove away in a cab, and as earnestly hissed and hooted Lord Douglas as he took his departure.
The Marquis went directly from the Marlborough street police station to the Old Bailey Court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The Marquis went directly from the Marlborough Street Police Station to the Old Bailey Court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The marquis went directly from the Marlborough street Police Court to the Old Bailey Court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The Marquis went directly from the Marlborough street police court to the Old Bailey court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The marquis went directly from the Marlborough st. police court to the Old Bailey court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The marquis went directly from the Marlboro st police court to the Old Bailey court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The marquis went directly from the Marlboro st police court to the Old Bailey court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The marquis went directly from the Marlborough police court to the Old Bailey court, where he was an attentive listener at the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The Marquis went directly from the Police Courts to the Old Bailey, where he was an attentive listener to the trial of Oscar Wilde.
The Marquis went directly from the Police Court to the Old Bailey, where he was an attentive listener in the trial of Oscar Wilde.
OSCAR WILDE’S TRIAL
So Indisposed That He Had to Leave the Court
Room During the Proceedings.
LONDON, May 22. - The second trial of Oscar Wilde began in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning. Wilde, upon entering the court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in the Marlborough Street Police Court in defending himself against a charge of disorderly conduct.
London, May 22. - The second trial of Oscar Wilde began in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning. Wilde upon entering court was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in the Marlborough Street Police Court in defending himself against a charge of disorderly conduct.
London, May 22.- The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices began in the Central criminal court, Old Bailey. this morning. Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by one of his sureties, the Rev. Stuart Headley, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in the Marlborough street police court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, evidently greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
LONDON, May 22. - The second trial of Oscar Wilde began in the central criminal court, Old Baily, this morning. Wilde, upon entering the court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas, of Hawick being engaged in the Marlborough street police court, in defending himself against the charge of disorderly conduct. Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
London, May 22.- The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices began in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning. Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stuart Headley, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being in the Marlborough st. police court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, being evidently greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick being engaged in the Marlborough st police court in defending himself against a charge of disorderly conduct.
Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick being engaged in the Marlborough st police court in defending himself against a charge of disorderly conduct.
LONDON, May 22. - The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices began in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning. Wilde upon entering court was accompanied by only one of his sureties, the Rev. Stewart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Haywick, being engaged in the Marlborough Street Police Court in defending himself against a charge of disorderly conduct. Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock. He had evidently been greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
LONDON, May 22.—The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices, began in the Central Criminal court, Old Bailey, this morning. Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stuart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in the Marlborough street Police court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday. Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The case had not been concluded when the court rose.
Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q. C., M. P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offences charged against Wilde, he said, in his opening address, occured between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid a special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelly. Mr. Lockwood thought the jury should accept the prosecution's evidence as regarded Wilde’s mode of life at the Savoy Hotel.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The offences charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occurred between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley. Mr. Lockwood thought the jury should accept the prosecution's evidence as regarded Wilde's mode of life at the Savoy Hotel.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The offenses charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occured between February, 1892 and October, 1893. He laid special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley. Mr. Lockwood thought the jury should accept the prosecution's evidence as regarded Wilde’s mode of life at the Savoy Hotel.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offences charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occured between February, 1892 and October, 1893. He laid especial stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q. C., M. P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offenses charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occurred between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid especial stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offences charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address occurred between February, 1892 and October, 1893. He laid special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelly.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C. M.P, conducted the prosecution. The alleged offense charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address ,occured between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid especial stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley.
Sir Frank Lockwood conducted the prosecution. The alleged offenses charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occured between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid especial stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley.
Sir Frank Lockwood conducted the prosecution. The alleged offenses charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occured between February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid especial stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley.
Edward Shelly was called to the stand and repeated what he had previously testified to. He declared that he had resented the overtures made to him by Wilde. Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelly severely. Shelly admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow Street Police Court giving the time of his breaking off the intimacy with Wilde, and also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Edward Shelly, the first witness, repeated his previous testimony. He declared that he had resented the overtures made him by Wilde. Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelly severely. Shelly admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow-street Police Court when giving the time of breaking off his intimacy with Wilde. He also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Edward Shelley was called to the stand, and repeated what he had previously testified to. He declared that he had resented the overtures made to him by Wilde. Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelley severely. Shelley admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow-street Police Court, giving the time of his breaking off of the intimacy with Wilde.
Edward Shelley was called to the stand and repeated what he had previously testified to. He declared that he had resented the overtures made to him by Wilde. Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelley severely. Shelley admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow-street Police Court giving the time of his breaking off of the intimacy with Wilde.
Edward Shelley was called to the stand and repeated what he had previously testified to. He declared that he had resented the overtures made to him by Wilde. Sir Edward Clark cross-examined Shelley severely. Shelley admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow Street Police Court giving the time of his breaking off intimacy with Wilde, and also admitted that while did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview. Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended. The proceedings were resumed in a few minutes.
Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelley severely. Shelley admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow street police court, giving the time of his breaking off intimacy with Wilde, and also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Sir Edward Clarke cross-examined Shelley severely who admitted he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow street police court giving the time of his breaking off his intimacy with Wilde, and also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Sir Edward Clark severely cross-examined Shelley, who admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow St. Police Court giving the time of his breaking off intimacy with Wilde, and also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Sir Edward Clark severely cross-examined Shelley, who admitted that he was mistaken in his testimony in the Bow Street Police Court, giving the time of his breaking off with Wilde, and also admitted that Wilde did not mention or suggest any acts of misconduct after the first interview.
Wilde became indisposed at this point, and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelly was meanwhile suspended. The proceedings were resumed in a few minutes.
Wilde became indisposed at this point, and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended. The proceedings were resumed in a few minutes.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended. The proceedings were resumed in a few minutes.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged temporarily to leave the dock. The examination of Shelly was meanwhile suspended, but proceedings were resumed in a few minutes.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to temporarily leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged to leave the dock. The examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended.
Wilde became indisposed at this point and was obliged temporarily to leave the dock, the examination of Shelley was meanwhile suspended. The proceedings was resumed in a few minutes. Mr. Elkin Matthews, the publisher, deposed that Wilde was acquainted with Shelley.
Shelly's cross-examination being resumed, he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now." He maintained, however, that the charges he had made against Wilde were true.
Shelley's cross-examination being resumed, he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now." He maintained, however, that the charges he had made against Wilde were true.
Shelley’s cross-examination being resumed, he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde, in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now." He maintained, however, that the charges he had made against Wilde were true.
Shelley's cross-examination being resumed, he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now."
Shelley's cross-examination being resumed, he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now."
Shelley's cross-examination being resumed he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He also admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said: "I am afraid that sometimes I am not very sane, but I am certain that I am sane now." He maintained, however, that the charges he had made against Wilde were true. Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Shelly's cross-examination being resumed he admitted that he had a brother who was insane. He admitted having written a letter to Wilde in which he said, "I am not very sane but I am certain that I am sane now."
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand, and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and, repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Barker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Barker were called to the stand, and repeated the testimony previously given by them. The Court then adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the court adjourned.
Alfred Wood and Charles Parker were called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given. At the end of the session Wilde was taken back to jail, but was released overnight on bail.